-In a article they posted yesterday regarding the attack in Norway they pointed suspicion to Muslims when now we all know it was indeed a caucasian man named Anders Behring Breivik. So should yahoo news apologize to Muslims for immediately putting the blame on them with no evidence what so ever?
Also for the record I'm not Muslim but instead a white Christian who is intolerant of racial and religious discrimination.You can't really blame the media for naming Muslims. For example, a few days before the attack Mullah Krekar, who founded the Kurdish terrorist group Ansar-Al-Islam, was charged with making threats against Norwegian politicians.
In addition, there were tons of Islamic groups who were foaming at the month with excitement trying to claim responsibility for the bombings & shootings. In fact, I recall one Islamic terrorist group who called themselves Global Jihad claiming responsibility within an hour after the news of the bombing.
In addition, he was a Freemason, Freemasonry means automatic excommunication by most Christian churches. Plus, he didn't kill for his religious views, he targeted a specific political party (bombed the government house, then shoot at an island where people were gathered to celebrate the current government).
Yes, they do owe an apology.
Just like the case of when an innocent man was suspected of being part of terrorism.
Yahoo reports news and opinion does not create news or opinion
I would rather perform oral sex on Tony Blair than apologise to the Muslim community.
Yahoo news was speculating on who may have had a motive.
No Muslim group was accused.
Never apologize to any organization that will never admit that in some cases they were wrong.
That will not happen. I bet the spin machine is already in action trying to blame Muslims again.
news pointing out suspicion is not really putting the blame on them,
I would apoligize but I doubt that they will.
没有评论:
发表评论