Has the media learned nothing?

-You'd think that after Jo Yeates' landlord sued police over his arrest for her murder, the media would be a bit more careful about splashing suspect stories and yet - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/articl鈥?/a>



Your thoughts?I for one was dismayed when I saw her photo on the national news last night. I thought it's innocent before proven guilty by the courts in the UK, plastering her face across the country before any charges have been made is appalling, it suggests she's guilty already, at least that's how lots of folk will see it. She and her family are paying a huge price while she's technically innocent.The media, given the current situation over hacking etc., and following on the Yates landlord farce, should really be behaving a bit more responsibly, but, NO, dive in, make the story fit, splash as many "Mad" photographs all over the place, really, beyond the pale...
Lol I posted a q about this yesterday, I think it is awful to post details of someone when they have not even been charged, her picture, name and address are all in the public domain and mud will stick even if she is entirely blameless.



If that is the case I hope she sues the living daylights out of them.



Update - she has now been charged!
No they don't learn,its the same old story,print first then worry about it later.

And its not just the Jo Yeates [the name escaped me earlier]

But you would think the press would of learnt something from the Murdoch/hacking story. Jo Public are sick of the papers techniques
I think she's hot.

Hey come on Dave the nutty ones are the best. Or did you want to have a conversation with her? She doesn't look mad enough to be illegal. LOL I bet she is a scream at a party, she looks great fun.
Well in some photos she looks quite hot, in others shes a bit rough.



She doesn't look all with it though .....